|

$1.1 Billion is A Lot of Money and 170,000 is A Lot of Students

ByAccountabaloney

On Wednesday evening, the Florida Senate took up HB7067, this year’s voucher expansion bill which seeks to quadruple the current annual enrollment growth rate and place qualifying income thresholds on an automatic escalator for the state’s new, directly funded Family Empowerment Scholarship (FES). You can read more about the bill here, here , and here.

Senator Tom Lee (R-20) offered an amendment (159850) to the bill, requiring participating private schools to report to the Department of Education their student enrollment, how many of their students are participating in voucher programs, how many are also participating in dual enrollment or virtual school programs, and the number of students who withdrew from the school by grade level, transferred to another school and the reason why. He got immediate pushback from pro-voucher senators like Senate Education Appropriations Chair, Kelli Stargel (R-22) and Senate Education Chair, Manny Diaz, Jr. (R-36). (You can watch here at 2:54:45)

Florida Politics covered the story, where Lee questioned why such basic accountability measures would be considered “oppressive”:

Stargel asked Lee whether the government needed to oversee the parents’ decisions on what school they placed their child in, arguing the money goes to the student, not the school.

“I think that’s a narrow view on accountability, Senator,” Lee replied.

Lee said after the Senate adjourned that he was prepared to continue to be a thorn in people’s sides. 

“This argument has just gotten ridiculous,” he said. “Where we gotta bring up who trusts parents … We’re appropriating $1.1 billion to be used for schools. Do we not have some obligation to the taxpayers to make sure that we’re getting the kind of data that helps us make policy around this program or deflect criticism?” 

Senator Lee pointed out that, all together, Florida’s voucher programs now serve 170,000 students at a cost of $1.1 BILLION per year and suggested “anyone appropriating $1.1 billion in a business would want some basic information about how those students are doing in those schools. “

We agree. Again, as we have written before: “from day one we have been in favor of a roll-back of the harsh, high stakes, test obsessed accountability requirements imposed on our public school children. We are NOT in favor of imposing such a system on a single extra student but the contrast between what is expected for these Family Empowerment recipients and the rest of Florida’s 2.8 million publicly funded school children is stark.”

Still, a $1.1 Billion annual program surely demands some oversight, doesn’t it?

To put things in perspective, if you haven’t noticed, 170,000 students is a lot of students:

  • The 170,000 students participating in all of Florida’s voucher programs would make “vouchers” the 6th largest district in Florida (behind Dade, Broward, Hillsborough, Orange and Palm Beach County).
  • The 170,000 students participating in all of Florida’s voucher programs would make “Florida’s vouchers” the 13th largest school district in the NATION.
  • At 170,000 students, there are more students enrolled in Florida’s voucher programs than in Florida’s 33 smallest school districts combined.
  • 170,000 represents 6% of Florida’s 2.85 million publicly funded school children.

More perspective, $1.1 Billion/year is (obviously) a lot of money. In the absence of an agreed upon budget from the legislature at this time, we chose to compare annual voucher spending to the spending celebrated in Governor DeSantis’ initial Bolder, Brighter, Better Future budget proposal:

  • The highest state K-12 public schools funding of all time at $13.2 billion: $1.1 billion represents 8.3% of that total state K-12 public schools funding
  • The highest total K-12 public schools funding of all time at $22.9 billion: $1.1 billion represents 4.8% of that total K-12 public schools funding.
  • The state’s entire Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten (VPK) funding at a level of $415 million ($1.1 billion represents 2.7 times VPK funding)
  • The entire Florida College System state operating fund is “only” $1.3 billion.

170,000 students is a lot of students. Who is assuring they are being offered quality choices? Should we be sending $1.1 billion of public funds to schools lacking basic accountability metrics? We suspect taxpayers will say “no.”

In an interview published yesterday in Florida Politics, Senator Lee, yesterday, where he expressed his frustration over education issues; saying “sometimes he feels like Republicans have run out of good ideas,” and promising to call into question these policies:

“Until you get a chance to go ‘mano a mano‘ with people on this floor and tell the truth and play a little game of show and tell here about what’s really going on, you’re not going to move public policy in this state because the fix is in.” 

Thank you, Senator Lee, for calling out the accountabaloney. We encourage you to continue to be that thorn in people’s sides. We hope other legislators will join you and insist on basic accountability metrics, allowing the legislature adequate data to guide policy decisions, before expanding this $1.1 billion program.

Please note, the failure to pass HB7067 will NOT eliminate the Family Empowerment Scholarship but, merely, keep the current income eligibility requirements (300% Federal Poverty Level or just over $77,000) and the current expansion rate of about 7,000 students/year.

Similar Posts

66 Comments

  1. Pingback: Bending the Rules: How the FL Senate Passed Voucher Expansion | accountabaloney

  25. They offer a safe and secure way to conduct your casino banking. Find top Australian casino sites that accept wire transfers with Casino Inquirer. Always confirm availability and limits in the bookmaker’s cashier and terms. These bookmakers support Bank Transfer in at least one market. An international wire then takes longer to clear than a domestic https://clubelectronicos.com/foro-electronica/topic/wire-transfer-casinos-best-real-money-online-casinos/, and amounts above A$10,000 can trigger AUSTRAC reporting that adds checks.

  27. Tätigen Sie eine Einzahlung und erhalten Sie einen Bonus von 50% bis zu 1.500 € sowie 50 Freispiele. Tätigen Sie eine Einzahlung und erhalten Sie einen Bonus von 50% bis zu 1.000 € sowie 50 Freispiele. Tätigen Sie eine Einzahlung und erhalten Sie einen Bonus von 100% bis zu 1.000 € sowie 100 Freispiele. Einmal erhalten, müssen die Free Spins verwendet werden, bevor der Spieler andere Wetten platziert. Im Falle eines Verstoßes gegen diese Regel behält sich die Verwaltung das Recht vor, alle Gewinne zu stornieren. In diesem Fall werden sowohl das Bonusgeld als auch die davon abgeleiteten Beträge aus dem Guthaben des Spielers entfernt, und das verbleibende Guthaben steht zur Auszahlung zur Verfügung.

    References: https://www.mrcp.ac.in/forum/topic/online-casino-bezahlen-mit-sofortuberweisung-ratgeber/

  53. Sie zahlen direkt aus Ihrem Girokonto und Gewinne landen in vielen Casinos auf demselben Weg zurück. Alles, was Sie dafür brauchen, ist ein aktiver Internetzugang und Zugang zu Ihrem Online-Banking-Verfahren. Wer Banking-Apps seiner Bank nutzt, kann Zahlungen direkt aus der App heraus bestätigen, ohne den Browser wechseln zu müssen. Einzahlungen funktionieren im mobilen Browser genauso wie in einer Casino App.

    References: https://forcesresources.com/forum/d/6-trustly-online-banking-casino-zahlungen-im-uberblick

  64. Using PayID as your payment method at online casinos in Australia not only offers quick and secure transactions but also opens the door to a variety of exciting bonuses. When it comes to withdrawals in online https://butterontoast.club/d/181-LeonTewksbury, the usual limits range from AU$ 50 to AU$ 10,000 per transaction. The Pay ID transfer itself is close to instant after approval — the main variable is how long the payid withdrawal casino spends checking KYC, wagering completion, and risk flags before it initiates the payment. At payid online casinos, you use the casino’s Pay ID address for deposits and your own Pay ID for withdrawals, with transfers routed securely through your bank’s own app environment. If a brand routinely leaves Pay ID withdrawals in pending status for more than two business days without explanation, it should not be treated as a genuine instant payid withdrawal casino regardless of what its marketing claims about casinos with PayID. The first window is casino approval time — how long the operator spends running its own KYC, wagering, and fraud checks before it releases the funds.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *