| |

Did Florida’s Third Graders Really Show In-Person Instruction Led to Better Learning Outcomes?

On June 22, 2021, the Florida Department of Education (FLDOE) released this year’s Florida Standards Assessment (FSA) English Language Arts (ELA) Grade 3 results, accompanied by a press release entitled “Florida’s Third Graders Show In-Person Instruction Led to Better Learning Outcomes” and this tweet: 

 

 

 

 

The FLDOE press release claimed:

  • “While the statewide percentage of Grade 3 students scoring Level 3 or above on the Florida Standards Assessment (FSA) English Language Arts (ELA) assessment saw a slight decrease, the data clearly shows that, on average, districts with higher rates of in-person instruction weathered the “COVID slide” better and saw lesser declines between 2019 and 2021 than districts with higher rates of virtual instruction.
  • Overall, in 2021 performance at Level 3 and above (on grade level and above) decreased by 4 percentage points compared to 2019 (58% to 54%).
  • All student subgroups continue to have a higher percentage of students performing at Level 3 and above than in 2015 when the FSA was first administered.
  • Charter school performance was higher than non-charter school performance by 8 percentage points on the 2021 Grade 3 FSA ELA (61% vs. 53% at Level 3 or above, respectively). Additionally, charter school performance has been consistently higher than non-charter school performance since 2015 when the test was first administered.”
The results, they said, “illustrate that Governor DeSantis and Commissioner Corcoran exhibited remarkable leadership while continuing to make the right decisions when fighting to provide parents with the choice to send their children to in-person learning.”

Seriously… does everything need a political spin? (That question was rhetorical, of course, because, you know, this is Florida…)

Let’s take a closer look at a couple of the FLDOE’s claims. (I will leave it to you to make your own decisions regarding anyone’s “remarkable leadership” skills.)

First. The FLDOE writes: “While the statewide percentage of Grade 3 students scoring Level 3 or above on the Florida Standards Assessment (FSA) English Language Arts (ELA) assessment saw a slight decrease, the data clearly shows that, on average, districts with higher rates of in-person instruction weathered the “COVID slide” better and saw lesser declines between 2019 and 2021 than districts with higher rates of virtual instruction.”

When I created a scatter plot, comparing the declines seen between 2019 and 2021 to rates of in-person instruction in each district, the FLDOE’s conclusions don’t appear to be that clear.

http://District 2019 to 2021 Comparison, FSA ELA Grade 3 and Learning Environment Enrollment (Excel)

For the record, I believe in-person instruction with a qualified teacher is far and above the best way to educate children. Given the choice, my family will always choose a classroom with a teacher. In fact, I have been writing about this for years. (See “Why I want an actual person teaching my child — not a computer,” which I wrote in 2016 and argued “Technology is a nice tool, but my children, all our children, they need teachers.”) Also, as the mother of two public high school students, one who graduated with the Class of 2021 a few weeks ago, I am grateful that they were able to have face-to-face time with teachers during this pandemic and, even, participate in extracurricular activities. I would love for Florida education policy to recognize the importance of classroom teachers and move away from the tech-heavy education mandates it has been pursuing over the past decade or so. Unfortunately, as much as I want it to be true, this year’s third grade data, in its current format, does not “clearly show” that in-person instruction outperformed virtual.

Realistically, how could we expect it to? The Covid pandemic affected families and communities in unequal and unprecedented ways. For example, Glades County, shortly before the Survey 3 count used as the data point for in-person instruction in the released dataset, had to close their entire district for several weeks due to rising numbers of Covid cases on their 3 campuses. Additionally, Covid did not affect student populations equally and an Orlando Sentinel report demonstrated that “public schools with the biggest percentages of low-income children — as well as those with large numbers of Black or Hispanic youngsters — often had the largest share of children opting for online learning.” They noted that such findings were not specific to Florida, reporting “a national survey released in August by researchers at the University of Southern California found that parental interest in having kids study from home during the pandemic varied by income, with those earning less more interested in remote education.” We already know that test scores are influenced by socioeconomic factors. When those same socioeconomic factors are also influencing decisions regarding in-person vs distance learning, can any real conclusions be made?

Also, the results from Florida Virtual School stand in stark contrast to the FLDOE’s suggestion that in-person third graders outperformed virtual students. Some of the best 3rd Grade ELA results came from Florida Virtual School, which outperformed almost every district (except St. Johns) with 72% of students achieving a level 3 or higher, despite having no in-person instruction. 

As for the FLDOE’s claims that Florida’s charter schools outperformed non-charter schools, not only this year but consistently since 2015… This is not the first time that Commissioner Corcoran’s administration has used state test scores to suggest that Florida’s charter schools outperform district managed public schools.  Such claims, in the past, have been challenged, suggesting that the differences in student populations (Florida’s charter school students are less likely to be classified as eligible for free or reduced-priced lunch, as English language learners, or as having disabilities) may account for any noticeable differences in test scores. Similar concerns clearly still apply and may be even more influential on test scores during this pandemic.

So, in answer to this blog’s title question, Did Florida’s Third Graders Really Show In-Person Instruction Led to Better Learning Outcomes?, it appears the answer is NO.

IMHO Florida needs less spin and more substance driving its education policy, but with 2022 and 2024 elections looming, I won’t hold my breath.

You can see the 2021 Grade 3 FSA ELA Results Packet here and the results by district and school here. Complete state testing results, including state mandated End of Course exams, grade level Math and Reading/ELA scores and Advanced Placement test scores are expected to be released in mid to late July.

Similar Posts

71 Comments

  1. Modern bank transfers offer efficiency and convenience,
    providing a direct connection between your bank and wire transfer casino payout Australia account- ideal for safe,
    everyday transactions. Although this is an old-fashioned banking method, many players prefer
    to use it to gamble online since it’s a secure option with bank-grade security
    features. They are easy to use and widely accepted, which makes them an excellent choice for those who
    prioritise security and simplicity in their transactions.
    They are mostly preferred for the speed and pseudonymity
    of transactions. Skrill and Neteller are the most popular e-wallets gamblers can use to deposit funds and cash out safely.

  2. Zudem wurden unsere Auszahlungen meist innerhalb weniger Stunden bearbeitet, vor allem
    bei der Nutzung von E-Wallets oder Trustly. Ja, in der Regel stehen alle Willkommensangebote der Online Spielos und Online Casinos auch für die
    Einzahlung per Sofortüberweisung zur Verfügung.
    Beachte nur, dass die Auszahlung nicht direkt per Sofortüberweisung klappt, Gewinne gehen stattdessen ganz klassisch per SEPA-Banküberweisung raus, was 1 bis 3 Werktage dauert.
    Mit der Sofortüberweisung in Spielotheken oder Casinos im Internet musst du nicht lange warten, bis dein Guthaben verfügbar
    ist.

    References: pentafrag.net

  3. No, online pokies aren’t rigged as long as you stick to licensed and
    regulated online casinos in Australia. Some are known for high-volatility games with massive payouts, while others focus on frequent,
    smaller wins. Each software provider featured at the
    best online casinos in Australia can be unique.
    It’s not an exact science, but some players swear by
    playing during off-peak hours at Australian online gambling neosurf australia casinos when there’s less competition for those jackpots.
    Set a loss limit before you start playing, and if you hit it, walk away.

  4. Das Gute ist, dass die Casinos mit Sofortüberweisung in der Regel keine Gebühren an die Spieler weitergeben. Zudem muss
    eine alternative Auszahlungsmethode für deutsche Spieler verfügbar
    sein, da eine Online Casino SOFORT Auszahlung generell nicht
    möglich. Für die Auszahlung nutzt der Spieler daher
    eine der anderen von gewählten Anbieter angebotenen Casino Zahlungsmethoden. Generell lohnt es
    sich in den SOFORT Casinos in Deutschland zu spielen,
    wenn man vertraut mit Online Banking ist. Um diesen Dienst nutzen zu können, ist keine spezielle Registrierung
    oder Kontoeröffnung erforderlich.

  5. Durch unseren Trustly Casino Test konnten wir erkennen, dass eine große Auswahl
    an Spielautomaten verschiedener Hersteller angeboten wird, sodass es sicherlich nicht langweilig wird.
    Prüfen Sie dies kurz in den Bonusbedingungen als zusätzliche Sicherheitsmaßnahme, bevor Sie einzahlen. Eine Übersicht der
    aktuellen Aktionen finden Sie in unserem Online Casino Bonus Vergleich.
    Trustly Casino ohne 5 Sekunden Regel gilt als seriös und gehört
    zu den wenigen Zahlungsmethoden, bei denen Auszahlungen in vielen deutschen Online Casinos direkt
    über dieselbe Methode möglich sind. Den vollen eingezahlten Betrag erhalten Sie auf Ihrem Spielerkonto gutgeschrieben, ohne Abzüge.

  6. Neosurf vouchers are available at many https://ps-social.eu/forum/topic/australia-casino-neosurf-7-must-knows/ retail outlets such as newsagents, petrol stations, and convenience stores, as well as through authorised online resellers. Minimum Neosurf deposits typically start from around A$10 to A$20, depending on the casino’s payment policy and bonus requirements. Pokies are the most popular games at Neosurf casinos in Australia, with thousands of titles available from leading providers such as Pragmatic Play, NetEnt, and Play’n GO.

  7. Signing up for a PayID online casino makes sense if you want to use this popular Aussie payment method to fund your online gambling. That’s a huge number, and it’s not just for bills; more and more players are using it at casinos in Australia too. PayID is quickly becoming one of the most popular ways to fund real‑money play at online casinos in Australia. If you want to take advantage of the quickest PayID withdrawals in Australia, we suggest you start playing at Neospin. https://forum.roguepenguingames.com/public/d/82-online-pokies-payid-deposit-instant-funding-guide-for-aussie-pokies-players are only safe if they are licensed and regulated.

  8. In order to make a withdrawal, the player must choose another option like bank transfer or credit card, or even one of the many e-wallet services. Shortly afterwards, it became available on other platforms as well, including poker sites. This is a new feature added to the https://allunderground.com/forum/topic/top-bpay-casinos-%e1%90%88-best-online-gambling-for-australia-2026/ service as they have started using tech advances to perfect their offering. Most often, they will allow you to use them as payment methods, just as accessibly as using funds from your bank account, but other times, you may experience amount limits or not having it even as an option. You should know that there may be some restrictions depending on your particular biller, however, such as the use of credit cards.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *