Dismissing the People’s Voice: A Civics Lesson

ByAccountabaloney

This week, while Governor DeSantis was holding press conferences promising to make Florida “the national leader in civics education” and Senator Brandes’ SB146, authorizing the creation of a nonpartisan civic literacy practicum, passed the Florida Senate with unanimous votes at every stop, students got a real world lesson in the realities of civic engagement in Florida’s capital. Namely, when your state’s legislature is dominated by a single party with a specific agenda, legislators feel no obligation to respond to “the voice of the people.”

Lesson #1: If the public commenter won’t be directly harmed by a bill supported by leadership, legislators can (and probably will) dismiss their concerns.

On Tuesday, 3/16/21, the Senate Education committee finally heard SB86, the controversial Bright Futures Bill. There had been overwhelming opposition to the bill’s creation of a list of majors considered “lead directly to employment.” If SB86 passes, the amount of Bright Futures scholarship award a qualified student receives would be dependent on whether their major is was that approved list or not. Presumably students would receive full funding if they majored in nursing or, perhaps, engineering while those majoring in the arts or humanities might see their scholarship award diminished.  “As taxpayers we should all be concerned about subsidizing degrees that just lead to debt, instead of the jobs our students want and need,” Baxley said in a news release on the legislation. 

Originally placed on the 3/9/21 agenda, the bill was temporarily postponed the night before that committee meeting due to growing opposition. Lawmakers reported being bombarded with emails and phone calls in opposition to the bill. An online petition had collected over 100,000 signatures in opposition to SB86. By 3/13 the bill was back on the agenda and, on 3/15, Baxley filed a delete-all amendment which “grandfathered in” all students currently receiving the scholarship, delaying the changes until the 2023-2024 academic year and  changed the “list of majors leading directly to employment” to a “list of majors determined NOT lead directly to employment.” Despite the revisions, opponents to the bill remained firm in their opposition when the bill was finally heard before the Education committee on 3/16/21.

Forty public commenters, many of them current Bright Futures recipients and high school students, gave compelling testimony. One man spoke incoherently in favor of the bill. Many students spoke against the approved list of majors, saying “Allowing students to choose their paths… will lead to a more productive and well-equipped, diverse and impactful workforce.” Senator Thurston filed an amendment to remove the degree program list but Baxley said that the primary intent of the bill was to limit scholarship funding to “programs that are beneficial to the student, state and the environment of the economy.” 

All of the Democrats on the panel questioned whether the government should be influencing what college students choose to study. Sen. Tina Polsky, (D-29) implored the panel to “Please, let’s listen to the students, let’s listen to the parents, let’s listen to our constituents.” 

Rather than listen to the students, Senator Travis Hutson (R-7) reminded the committee (on two separate occasions) that “everyone who spoke today, even the seniors in high school, will be grandfathered in, and have their bright futures” saying any promise that had been made by the state to anyone currently in college, would be kept by the state. The bill, of course, passed the committee 5-4 along party lines despite Senator Jennifer Bradley (R-5) expressing concerns, noting that one of her children is majoring in Russian and international relations, and wondering if those fields of study would be on a list of career-friendly majors:

“Would I have picked those majors? No. But that’s her dream,” Bradley said. “And I just disagree with the idea that the state gets to define that dream.”

Bradley disagreed with the bill’s primary intent, just like the student opposition. Her NO vote, would have killed the bill…

[To be clear, there are also significant concerns regarding changes to how the Bright Futures program will be funded. Bright Futures is a merit based scholarship currently funded by lottery proceeds. Students are awards an amount (either 75% or 100% of tuition) based on their accomplishments plus a stipend for books funded through the General Appropriations Act (GAA). SB86 would change Bright Futures from “the award necessary to pay a specified percentage of tuition and specified fees” to “an award as specified in the GAA.” In other words, the value of the scholarship would become subject to legislative budget allocation, i.e. the whims of the current legislature. Hmmm… I wonder how that will turn out?]

Lesson #2: If you come to the Capitol to testify, do so in a civil and respectful manner. They won’t change their vote but they might thank you afterwards.

The right to collective bargaining is enshrined in Florida’s Constitution (Article 1, section 6) but, nevertheless, attacking teachers unions appears to be a favorite pastime of many legislators. This year, legislators wasted no time placing SB78 on the fast track. SB78, filed by Lee County Republican, Senator Ray Rodrigues, has been dubbed the “union busting bill.” It would add additional restrictions to payroll deductions for union dues from public-employee paychecks, requiring confirmation in addition to written request. SB78 passed its first two committee stops along party lines but appears to be temporarily stalled in the Senate Rules committee, probably because it affects all public unions. Its identical House companion, HB947, passed its first committee on 3/8/21 and it waiting to be heard in State Affairs.

If lawmakers are unable to “bust” all public unions, they still have options to, specifically, disempower the teachers union. SB1014 (Baxley)/ HB835 (Byrd) are union busting bills that only apply to teachers unions.  Other public unions (Police, Fire) would not be affected. The bills would require labor organizations to demonstrate every year that they have at least 50% of a bargaining unit’s workforce as dues-paying members. The bills also would prohibit school boards from deducting union dues from an employee’s paycheck. SB1014 was described as “a one-two punch” by Rich Templin of the Florida AFL-CIO, saying “It makes it very difficult for those dues to be paid by those who want to pay them, and if not enough dues are paid, then the bargaining unit is decertified.” On 3/8/21, HB835 received favorable approval in its first committee stop, the House Government Operations Subcommittee.

On 3/17/21, Baxley’s SB1014 was heard before the Senate Governmental Oversight and Accountability committee. Teachers from across the state assembled at the Donald L. Tucker Civic Center, to give public testimony in opposition to the bill. The teachers overwhelmed the Civic Center, filling the assigned room to capacity while excess commenters lined up around the building. Almost 100 people signed up to speak, many were given just 30 seconds to explain their concerns. Their message was clear. “SB 1014 is unnecessary red-tape. Nobody is asking for this bill.” Union members from across the political spectrum questioned why only the teachers union was under attack? A veteran Leon County teacher asked “If these additional requirements are so great, why do they not apply to all unions? Why are you just attacking educators?” Absolutely no one spoke in support of the bill.

So, of course, by a vote for 3 republican Yeas and 2 democratic Nos, the bill passed the committee. After voting in favor of the union busting bill despite overwhelming opposition, Senator Mayfield took a moment to thank all the teachers who had come to testify, saying “You know, we all immensely respect our teachers and this is in no way… an attack against them whatsoever and we do thank them for all that they do.” Committee Chair, Senator Rodrigues (the same Rodrigues who sponsored the now stalled SB78) applauded the teachers who had come to testify saying :

“We got through a significant number of speakers and we did that because they were very orderly stayed on time and task and really, I think, set an example for others who have come up to the legislature to speak on bills on how to advocate for yourself and do it in a manner that is very civil and respectful and, as always, our teachers are setting the example, right, I just hope that many people watched and saw their example and can learn from that …” -Senator Ray Rodrigues

https://thefloridachannel.org/videos/3-17-21-senate-committee-on-governmental-oversight-and-accountability/

Shortly after SB1014 passed the Government Oversight and Accountability committee, the bill was placed on the fast track to the Senate floor; the bill’s reference to the Judiciary committee was removed, sending the bill directly to its final committee stop in the Rules committee. Fast-tracking the union busting bill is an interesting way of rewarding teachers for their commendable behavior…

Dismissing the voice of overwhelming opposition… Are these the types of lessons our kids can expect to learn when Florida becomes “the national leader in civics education”?

Similar Posts

67 Comments

  1. When government fails to listen to the people, government fails. It takes courage to protect our freedoms and I am praying some of the Republican Legislators have the courage oppose these bills.

  2. Pingback: In Life, There are No Guarantees – Dennis Baxley Gets Real about Bright Futures Funding. | accountabaloney

  20. Some vip payid casinos attract crypto fans with more lucrative bonuses
    designed specially for crypto deposits. Nonetheless, crypto withdrawal amounts are normally governed by general rules applicable
    to all payment options. When a high-roller wants to deposit a big amount, cryptocurrencies turn out to be the
    best choice because most gambling sites come with no or huge crypto deposit limits.

  28. If you can’t or don’t wish to use other payment options like cards or e-wallets online then casino bank transfers provide highly secure option for your
    online gaming. If you would like to play immediately, then there are
    faster ways to deposit. Wire transfers are immediate, reliable,
    and safe ….For significant transactions—like buying a home—wire transfers or cashier’s checks might be your only options.

    References: strucfit.com

  32. Der Bonus für Neukunden ist klein – 50 Freispiele nach 10 € Einsatz –, aber ohne Wagering auf die Gewinne.
    Einfach beantragt – und das Geld war da. Genau so lange hat die casino auszahlung sofortüberweisung bei Bet365 via PayPal gedauert.
    Bet365 – PaysafeCard-Auszahlung in 1–4 Stunden –
    so geht schnelle Auszahlung Der Willkommensbonus für Slots – 100% bis 50 € plus 100 Freispiele auf Book of Dead –
    ist ehrlich und klar kommuniziert.

  51. Alf Casino is the standout choice for users whose main priority is pokies. Wild Tokyo is the top-ranked Pay ID venue in Australia for 2026 because it processes withdrawals through this method more consistently fast than any other brand in this guide. This section looks beyond headline promotions and quick summaries to focus on how each PayID-focused brand actually performs for real-money users — from banking speed and limits to overall usability and reliability. The table below gives a fast overview of the strongest PayID gambling options for Australian users.

    References: https://forum.rukoeu.com/d/181-bpay-banking-at-online-casinos-in-2026-3-casinos-accept-bpay

  52. No, not all casinos that accept Neosurf provide a welcome bonus, and the terms attached to those that do vary widely. A prepaid voucher casino is an online gambling platform that accepts Neosurf as a deposit method. Some Australian online casinos charge a small percentage for card deposits, while bank transfers often carry fixed fees that eat into low-budget play. Compared to some e-wallets, it has lower fees and a simpler verification process. These features give players practical control over their gambling behaviour and reflect a genuine commitment to player welfare.

    References: https://survivalgeargurus.com/discussion/flarum/public/d/439-neosurf-gambling-sites-australia-what-to-know

  53. Du benötigst lediglich ein Girokonto mitfreigeschaltetem Online-Banking. Wer die Kombination aus sofortiger Guthaben-Verfügbarkeit, voller Bonusberechtigungund TÜV-zertifiziertem Datenschutz sucht, findet in lizenzierten Trustly Online Casinos eine erstklassigeLösung. Das DuxCasino gehört zu den beliebtesten Anbietern für schnelle https://dracialegia2012.sk/forum/topic/trustly-casino-echtgeld-zahlungen-sicherheit-limits/-Transaktionen. Das von StarscreamLtd / Gammix Ltd betriebene Casino überzeugt mit einer offiziellen MGA-Lizenz und belohnt Neukundenmit einem umfangreichen dreistufigen Willkommenspaket von bis zu 2.500€ Bonusguthaben sowie 250 Freispielen für Book of Dead ab 20€ Mindesteinzahlung. Bei der Einzahlung werden die erforderlichen Verifizierungsdaten (KYC) direkt und sichervon deiner Hausbank an das Casino übermittelt.

  61. PayID maps a unique contact identifier to a designated bank account. We assess PayID online casinos based on the complete payment experience rather than relying on promotional badges in a site’s footer. Crypto remains the fastest payment route on this platform, clearing instantly or within 24 hours. To keep our reviews free, we may earn a commission if you click our links and make a deposit, which involves no extra costs or hidden fees for you.

    References: https://wabaexpert.com/d/780-best-payid-casinos-in-australia-for-2026

  62. The process went smoothly, and even though I forgot to verify my account first, everything was completed in less than an hour, including the verification. It’s been my go-to e-wallet for casino payments, so it’s good to see it included as an available payment method. You can use plenty of crypto and fiat options like MiFinity, PayAnyBank, bank transfers, USDT, ETH, DOGE, BCH, and more, and all of them are eligible for the welcome bonus of up to A$5,000 and 300 FS. DragonSlots is primarily a crypto casino, and I know for a fact that it’s very quick to process withdrawals, but this was unexpected even for me.

    References: https://elenchufeinteligente.es/foro/topic/highest-rated-casino-picks-accepting-bpay/

  66. Außerdem haben wir eine Liste der besten Online https://www.amita-bhakta-hidden-wash.net/cri-wash-hub/forum/topic/bestes-sofort-casino-sicher-einzahlen-schnell-auszahlen/ für deutsche Spieler erstellt. Täglich empfängt ein Online Casino mit Sofortüberweisung Tausende von europäischen Spielern, welche die Vorteile des Zahlungssystems Sofortüberweisung bevorzugen. Wenn Sie also in einer Casino App für iPhone, iPad oder Android Geräte einzahlen möchten, müssen Sie eine Alternative, wie zum Beispiel eine Kreditkarte oder PayPal, verwenden. Der E-Payment Dienst nutzt die Sicherheitsvorkehrungen wie das Passwort und die TAN-Nummern Ihres Online Bankings und ist deshalb genau so sicher, wie jede Online Überweisung, die Sie mit der Software Ihrer Bank durchführen. Voraussetzung dafür ist lediglich ein Online Banking fähiges Girokonto bei einer deutschen Bank und dass Sie den benötigten TAN-Generator oder Ihr Handy zum Empfang der SMS-TAN zur Hand haben.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *