| |

HB109 and “State-Sponsored Pilfering” of Florida’s Public Schools

ByAccountabaloney

Last week, before Florida’s House Choice and Innovation Education subcommittee voted favorably, along party lines, on HB109, Rep. Katherine Waldron (D-93, Palm Beach) summarized her passionate opposition:

“I think it’s not really fair to chip away with all these bills, from the voucher program to some of these bills, at public schools and then turn around and say they are failing us. That is a false narrative in my mind. I have received close to a thousand emails on this bill, passionately against this bill. I have not seen one email supporting it. I am concerned, among other things, that this is going to end up being nothing more than a land grab by entities who do not have students’, parents’ and communities’ interests in mind.”

HB109 will now move on to House PreK-12 Appropriations.

HB109 allows municipalities to apply to convert one or all of the public schools in their jurisdiction to charter schools, eliminates involvement of teachers in the conversion charter decision making process and creates a process for the State to identify underutilized school district properties which the school board must, then, offer rent-free to charter schools within the district (and then, if no local charters apply in 6 months, the district must convert the property to affordable housing).

I, like Rep. Waldron, am a passionate opponent of HB109.

Conversion Charters

The current process for converting an existing public school to a charter school is outlined in Florida Statute (f.s. 1002.33). There are currently 23 conversion charter schools operating in Florida (3 percent of the total number of charter schools in the state). The application to convert a district managed public school to a charter school currently can may be made by a parent, teacher, principal, district school board or school advisory council, but must be approved by a majority of the teachers and a majority of the parents participating in the vote. Additionally, a majority of the parents must participate in the vote – meaning support from as few as 25% of the current parents are needed to trigger the conversion. To begin the ballot process, the applicant may submit a request in writing to the school administrator to conduct a vote for conversion, and the administrator must complete the ballot process within 60 days of receipt of the written request.

HB109 changes the conversion process in two significant ways.

  1. Local municipalities are added to the list of entities who can apply to convert public schools to charter schools. In HB109, a local municipality (say a town council or a county commission) could apply to convert one or all of the public schools in their jurisdiction to charter schools under a single application. Those schools would then have 60 days to complete the ballot process. (Of note, currently, local municipalities may apply to create a new charter school but not to convert an existing public school.)
  2. A majority vote of the teachers will no longer be required for ANY charter conversion to take place (whether the applicant is a municipality or not). The schools will be converted to charter schools solely on the vote of the parents whose students currently attend the school.

Florida’s largest for-profit charter chains have active lobbyists and donate large amounts of campaign contributions. The passage of HB109 could allow large for-profit corporate charter chains to convince small city councils to hand over their public schools, free of charge. There is no language describing how a local community, appalled by the actions of a few small town officials who gave away their local public institutions to for-profit entities, could regain control of their public schools.

Currently a local school community CAN apply to convert their school to a charter school, so why is this bill needed?

I can only think of 2 reasons-

  1. To remove teachers from the decision making process, though one could argue, the teachers might be most impacted by the conversion OR
  2. If you are a corporate charter chain that wants to expand without having to invest in building schools, all you need to do is flip a municipal board and that would be much cheaper than flipping a county wide school board.

HB109 was described by several Democratic committee members as part of a continued attempt to chip away at public schools and by Jacksonville collumnist, Nate Monroe, as “state-sponsored pilfering.” “State sponsored pilfering” is a perfect description.

HB109 was first heard on 1/18/24 in Choice and Innovation. The sponsor, Rep. Alex Andrade (R-2, Escambia, SantaRosa) explained he woke up a few months ago, had a conversation with a friend who disagrees with him politically on every topic, and wondered “why can’t municipalities convert public schools into charter schools?”

[I would suggest it is because Article IX, section 4(b) of the Florida Constitution says it is school boards and not local city councils who must “operate, control and supervise all free public schools within the school district.” This is what local school boards are elected to do.]

Andrade said he did some “research” and learned that while municipalities can apply to create a new charter school they are not allowed to apply to convert an existing public school into a charter school. He said the idea sprung from his “front row seat” witnessing the conversion process, triggered by Florida’s turnaround process, involving Warrington Middle School, in his community.

For the record, neither the teachers nor the parents at Warrington Middle School, in Escambia County, got to vote as to whether their school should be converted to a charter school. State turnaround policies forced the conversion on the community. The conversion was one of the few remaining state-mandated turnaround options available to the Escambia School Board for the school that had received “D” or “F” grades for the past decade. The only other turnaround option available was to close the school and provide bus transportation for the Warrington students to other, higher rated, district middle schools. The Escambia School Board had searched for a charter school willing to come in and manage the school for several years before Charter Schools USA (CSUSA), one of Florida’s largest (and most politically connected) for-profit corporate charter chains, applied with the full support of the Florida Department of Education and the State Board of Education (FLBOE). The FLBOE essentially adopted the conversion of Warrington Middle as a pet project. Rep Andrade blames the Escambia School Board for what he described as the “painful” and “dysfunctional” process that ensued during the contract negotiations between CSUSA and the school board. One of the largest sticking points was CSUSA’s plan to expand the school to K-12 and, with time, remove the preference for the students within the existing Warrington Middle School boundaries – which would ultimately result in the district having to provide bus transportation for those students to surrounding schools. Some students would need to be bussed to a middle school over an hour away from their community. Despite considerable pressure from the FLDOE and FLBOE to agree to CSUSA’a stipulations, the school board was adamant that the zoned students continue to have access to Warrington Middle and, ultimately, CSUSA promised to do so and the conversion agreement was made.

The 1% Enrollment decline Amendment

HB109 is not solely about Conversion Charter Schools. An amendment to the original HB109 also passed during the 1/18/24 Choice and Innovation meeting creating a process where, if a school district experiences a decline in student enrollment of one percent or more for at least two consecutive years (perhaps a hurricane, followed by a pandemic? Or a factory shutdown?), the FLDOE and the Department of Management Services is required to designate vacant school district real property as surplus and the school district must make those designated properties available to charter schools and charter school governing boards within the school district and then transfer the control and operation of that property to the charter school or the charter school governing board without charging any rental, leasing, or other usage fees. Also, if, after 6 months, no charter school takes the deal, the property must be used for affordable housing.

This is the “state-sponsored pilfering” Nate Monroe described. No teacher or parent has a say. Neither does the school board. In fact the local community has no say at all. With the amended HB109, what should be a local decision – the repurposing of public assets – will be made by bureaucrats in Tallahassee.

Rep. Angie Nixon (D-13, Duval) asked Andrade a simple Yes or No Question (You can watch the interaction at ~40:25): “If a current charter school moved into a used district building, would they be allowed to profit from selling their original property.” Andrade responded: There are so many different scenarios in that context… I am unable to give you an answer just because of how broad that question actually is.” Committee Chair Alex Rizo (R-112, Miami-Dade) agreed with Andrade, Nixon’s Yes or No question “was extremely open-ended, with many different scenarios.” For the record, the answer is clearly “YES.” Through real estate dealings, Florida’s for-profit charter corporations have been able to generate vast wealth.

Twelve speakers commented on the amendment (including The Florida PTA, Florida Association of District School Superintendents, Miami Dade Public Schools and several others, including me, in opposition). Only three voiced support: Chris Moya, the lobbyist for CSUSA, Nathan Hoffman, the lobbyist for Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Florida’s Future and Ryan Kennedy, lobbyist for the Florida’s Citizens Alliance.

I reminded the committee of the various ways public school buildings and properties are used in my district. These are my prepared remarks (you can watch me at 50:20).

“This amendment is overly prescriptive, dictating what a local community must do with excess public property. These decisions should be made in the local community and not etched in state statute.

If school districts have excess property, is the best use of that public property automatically a charter school? While affordable housing is a challenge across Florida, there are some communities that have more pressing needs.

For example, here in Tallahassee there are areas sorely lacking preschools and child care centers. When an elementary school was under capacity, it was converted to an early childhood center… something the community desperately needed.

In my community in Monroe, underutilized schools and district owned properties have been converted to the Key West City Hall, community parks, the Islamorada Library and our county health department. The monument to the victims of the 1935 hurricane is on school district property. Currently, our fire department has approached us with the hope we can transfer a small plot of land to them for a necessary storage facility. We are also in the process of building 150 units of affordable housing on school district property in Key West. That construction will require the relocation of our administration building, which we hope to move to a historic school building in desperate need of renovation. These are things that our community wants and needs. We shouldn’t have to wait 6 months, in case a charter school wants to utilize the property, before we can move forward to address our community’s needs.

As stewards of the school district’s property, local school boards, not this legislature, should be making these decisions.” Sue Woltanski, 1/18/24

The only person speaking in support of the amendment was Chris Moya, the lobbyist for Charter Schools USA. (you can watch his testimony at 52:50). He said HB109 was “about practical barriers to developing choice.” He, also, almost immediately noted that my county, Monroe County, has grown by 4.19% in the last year so, he said, “all of those points being made, Monroe County is not part of it.” [Right, but in 2002 we did have 2 back to back school years with declining enrollment, and the same could happen in the future…] Moya explained that though the Legislature has embraced choice, there are counties where there is no land left. He says, collectively, over the years districts have raised about $4 billion in referendum money and they have begun “land banking,” claiming “any piece of property where a charter could have gone, was bought over the last decade” leaving  Broward County, who has seen declining enrollment, with “practically no places left to develop”. In Moya’s mind, the only way to further develop school choice in Broward is to have the state come down and hand public assets over to charter schools.

[You can learn more about how corporate charter chains, like CSUSA, profit through publicly funded Real Estate Scams and Self-Dealing in “Stories About How Charters Profit and Suspect Statistics from a Charter School Lobbyist,” which I wrote after the last time I hear Mr. Moya testify.]

With the passage of the amendment, the bill was temporarily postponed in order to change the bill’s title, which no longer focused solely on conversion charter schools. The conversation resumed in committee on 1/25/24.

During the public comment period on 1/25/24, there were 23 individuals/organizations opposing HB109 and only 3 groups in support (the lobbyist for the Florida Citizen’s Alliance spoke and Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Florida’s Future and the Koch funded Americans for Property waived in support). Not one member of a local municipality, no city council members or county commissioner, spoke in favor of the ability to convert public schools in their community.

Despite overwhelming opposition, the bill passed along party lines.

The good news is that the Senate companion (SB246, sponsored by Sen. Harrell, R-31) doesn’t seem to be moving at this time. Also, SB246 currently focuses only on Conversion Charters and does not contain the 1% Enrollment Decline Amendment.

This session, in an attempt to “level the playing field” between public schools and charters/vouchers, the Florida Senate has established the deregulation of public schools as their education priority. Creating more ways to give public schools away to charter chains, will NOT “level any playing field.” Florida’s Senate should reject the proposed policies in HB109 and the continued state-sponsored pilfering of our public schools

Similar Posts

146 Comments

  1. You recently retweeted a blog from a California “public education advocate” named Thomas Utica who said that billionaires should be removed “from existence”

    -Is that also your belief? No one in the United States should be allowed to be a billionaire? Do you mean having a billion USD in the bank? Do you mean in terms of total assets?
    -With power vested to you to make such a thing happen, how specifically would you forcibly redistribute wealth?
    -What would you do with the people who disagree with this policy once you have power? What will you do with them and how will you use the power of the state against them? Please be more specific than when you just pretended like once public schools were “fully funded” (a number you refuse to name) every private school not up to your standards would just disappear because no one would use state funded scholarships to attend them
    -Do you consider yourself a socialist? Are you a member of any socialist organizations?
    -When you appear before committees in Tallahassee, why do you never refer to the bills you disagree with as scams and grifts like you do on your blog behind your computer? If a lawmaker is sponsoring a bill that is a scam or a grift, would that person not be a scammer or grifter?

    Thank you for your quick reply.

  2. Do you mean this piece by Thomas ULtican? https://inschoolmatters.wordpress.com/2024/02/05/child-labor-is-an-education-issue/

    That was a post that connected the current move to roll back Child Labor laws to the moves to dismantle public education. It also highlighted that the national attack on child labor restrictions has been “spearheaded by the Foundation for Government Accountability, a Florida-based advocacy group.” I know nothing of Ultican’s political views or beliefs about billionaires. I read the opinions of many individuals from across the political spectrum.
    You seem to want to demonize me. I have never found that to be productive to finding common ground, which is necessary to move forward in a democracy (or even a Constitutional Republic).
    I feel no need to answer incessant questions from someone who hides behind bogus emails and false names. Please get a different hobby.

  3. You literally retweeted his piece on billionaires. Either your bad faith is ruthlessly unrelenting and bordering on sociopathic or there is a major cognitive issue here. Either way, a disaster that you attempt to influence education policy

  4. Oh, you are referring to this one: https://tultican.com/2024/02/04/promotion-of-education-savings-accounts-aka-vouchers/, where Ultican writes: “Billionaires like Koch, the Walton family and former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos are intent on using their wealth to defeat democratic support for public schools and end “Democracy’s Schools.” America can no longer afford to put up with billionaires and their non-democratic ways.”?

    Yes, I yearn for the days when the nation’s richest people (like the Carnegies) built public libraries rather than using their wealth to tear down public schools.

  5. Pingback: It Could Have Been Worse: An Update on Florida’s 2024 Session – Accountabaloney

  38. You can enjoy these titles in RNG format or in a live dealer casino, with the latter allowing interaction with croupiers and other players. Since you’ll find Neosurf pokies that cost only a few cents per spin, you can get fantastic mileage out of relatively small deposits. Neosurf deposits can fund pokies, table games, specialty titles, and instant-win games when those games are available at your casino. Before claiming a bonus, you have to get acquainted with their terms and conditions at the https://comunidad.sidesed.com/t/neosurf-alternative-payment-methods-casino-au-guide/198 sites, such as rollover, deposit limits, and excluded games.

  39. Geblieben sind klassische Banküberweisung, Kreditkarte, Sofortüberweisung und in einigen Fällen E-Wallets wie Skrill oder Neteller. Diese Liste ist nicht abschließend und ändert sich, weil Betreiber ihre Zahlungsdienstleister regelmäßig anpassen. Trustly-Transaktionen laufen in der Regel innerhalb von 2 bis 10 Sekunden durch, was bedeutet, dass Guthaben praktisch sofort verfügbar ist. Trustly ist kein klassischer Zahlungsdienstleister im Sinne von PayPal oder Skrill. Sowohl Sofortüberweisung als auch Giropay funktionieren nach einem ähnlichen Prinzip und erlauben kostenfreie Einzahlungen im Online Casino innerhalb weniger Sekunden. https://discourse.pbbg.com/t/trustly-casino-ohne-gebuhren-kosten-sicher-prufen/661 ist en Zahlungsdienstleister aus Schweden, der es ermöglicht, Zahlungen innerhalb weniger Sekunden direkt vom Bankkonto aus in ein Online Casino zu tätigen.

  40. Die folgenden Anbieter haben sich im deutschen Markt durch unterschiedliche Stärken hervorgetan und gehören zu den empfehlenswertesten https://survivalgeargurus.com/discussion/flarum/public/d/355-online-spielothek-mit-sofort-zahlungen-sicher-prufen. PayPal bietet schnellere Auszahlungen, ist aber nicht bei allen Anbietern verfügbar und setzt ein eigenes Konto voraus. Sie können mit einem Willkommensbonus oder einem Einzahlungsbonus Gratis-Guthaben erhalten und so Ihren verfügbaren Bonus Betrag oft mindestens verdoppeln.

  42. Thousands of https://forum.sfnl.scot/d/503-best-neosurf-casinos-australia-2026-top-sites-ranked, hundreds of live tables, dozens of crash games and arcade games – all of these become eligible for real-money betting as soon as you redeem your voucher. This payment method makes it possible to play absolutely every type of game available at gambling clubs. The quantity and quality of the software are important, but what’s the point of 12,000 titles if not a single one is a favourite? If someone loves slots from Relax Gaming casinos, they simply have no business being on a site without games from that provider. Some people prefer an open menu on the left, some prefer a control panel with main sections at the top, whilst others simply want to see only games on the page.

  43. Einzahlungen werden in der Regel innerhalb von Sekunden gutgeschrieben, da casinos mit sofort in der Regel eine sofortige Buchungsbestätigung erhalten und das Spielerkonto umgehend aufgeladen wird. Zum einen orientiert sich die https://blog.granitestateshooting.com/forum/topic/sofort-casino-freispiele-bedingungen-bonus-auszahlung/ an deinen bereits bestehenden Limits deiner Hausbank, da über diese die Transaktion zu Klarna bzw. Im Online Casino mit Sofortüberweisung zu bezahlen, erfordert kein zusätzliches Konto beim Zahlungsanbieter Klarna, der dir die Sofort Casino Einzahlung anbietet. Ähnlich wie bei Trustly handelt es sich auch hier um einen schwedischen Anbieter, der seine Dienstleistungen auch Online Casinos und deren Kunden anbietet. In unserem Testverfahren testen wir dabei nicht nur die Verfügbarkeit und die angebotenen Kanäle, über die der Kundendienst erreichbar ist, sondern zusätzlich, wie kompetent und freundlich dieser ist.

  44. Our experts have done extensive and elaborate research into determining the highest-ranked online casinos for Australian players that feature PayID payments. Begin by selecting https://clubelectronicos.com/foro-electronica/topic/new-payid-pokies-australia-best-instant-deposit-sites-2026/ casinos that prioritise fair gameplay and provide a secure environment. To initiate the use of the pokies PayID method, you’ll need to first establish an account with an Aussie bank and attach an identifier. Instead of sharing your card/BSB number and other details, simply enter a unique code linked to your bank account. Options like POLi, BPAY, and Cryptocurrencies have gained popularity among Aussie players for their reliability and convenience. Sometimes, you have to activate appropriate PayID pokies Australia no deposit bonus codes.

  47. Slots Gallery is a top pick for players looking for a $20 Neosurf casino Australia real money experience focused on a huge pokies selection and frequent promotional rewards. A $20 Neosurf casino Australia real money deposit is enough to unlock bonuses and explore a wide mix of pokies, jackpots, and live dealer games. Boho Casino is a modern choice for players looking for a https://www.singlefather.eu/forum/topic/neosurf-casino-australia-review-fees-safety-payouts/ experience with smooth mobile performance and steady VIP rewards. For players wanting a low-deposit Neosurf casino Australia, Lucky 7 delivers excellent value. The casino focuses on rewarding new members with generous promotional packages while maintaining a straightforward gaming experience. Lucky 7 is an excellent choice for players specifically searching for $20 Neosurf casinos with welcome bonus offers.

  81. None of this is a case for or against any particular casino site — that’s a separate question involving licensing jurisdictions and how an operator is set up, not how a payment clears. BPAY deposits run through the same bank-level encryption as any other BPAY transaction — paying a phone bill or funding a pokie session goes through an identical security layer, because it’s the same rail. Slots run on volume — small stakes, fast spins, dozens of rounds an hour — and that rhythm sits awkwardly next to a payment method built for paying the electricity bill. Nothing here confirms roulette, pokies, or any specific game category accepts it, and nothing here touches what happens when a player wants money out. Unfortunately, BPAY casinos don’t support withdrawals because BPAY was designed for outgoing payments only (like paying bills).

    References: https://freebtc.my/d/51-pokies-deposit-with-bpay-safe-or-not

  88. If you want a straightforward card payment, this is the way to go. It’s simple, especially if you prefer mobile gaming sessions, and if you want more details, you can find them right here. It lets you pay straight from your bank – no need to mess around with card numbers – all you need is your online banking app. Crypto works with most online pokies Australia and real money games, although bonuses change from site to site.

    References: https://toyvaulthq.com/forum/topic/the-no-1-best-online-pokies-australia-payid-real-money-mistake-youre-making-and-four-methods-to-fix-it/

  89. It’s advisable to check the specific terms of the casino we are using, as they can differ significantly. Thus, we might want to consider transferring to an e-wallet or using bank transfers if these options are available. By exploring these exclusive offerings, we can maximize our gaming experience at Neosurf casinos across Australia. The bonuses offered at Neosurf casinos significantly enhance the gaming experience.

    References: https://kindheartsng.org/forum/topic/fast-payout-neosurf-casino-australia-cashout-guide/

  97. You may prefer Neosurf for deposits but need another method for withdrawals if the casino does not support direct Neosurf payouts. Neteller is an e-wallet and can be more convenient for repeated payments than a prepaid voucher. If you want to make regular payments or prefer using the same method for both deposits and withdrawals, there are several alternatives. It can offer additional account and refund features after verification, but this does not mean every casino supports withdrawals through myNeosurf. Before using one of the https://gradjazza.org/forum/d/15-australian-online-casinos-neosurf-fees-safety-guide in Australia, check how winnings can be withdrawn. The process for Neosurf deposits at online casinos in Australia is usually similar from one site to another.

  128. Are there any specific licensing or operational requirements for operators accepting digital currencies (including cryptocurrencies)? The use of cryptocurrency for online wagering was recently prohibited following amendments to the Interactive Gambling Act. For example, in 2017, a large Australian gambling company paid an AUS $45 million civil penalty to AUSTRAC for the failure to comply with certain requirements under the AML/CTF Act.

    References: https://lecomteyachts.eu/forum/topic/wire-transfer-pokies-sites-australia-overview-for-2026/

  130. Mobile players can usually access the same core categories through a browser or app. Common Neosurf casino games include pokies, roulette, blackjack, baccarat and jackpot titles. The available lobby still depends on the casino, software providers and regional restrictions. This threshold is enough to activate bonuses and extend play, and it reflects the payment system’s fees under the PCI-DSS protocol. However, the minimum https://ezhow.net/resources/forum/topic/neosurf-casino-match-bonus-australia-terms-tips/ deposit does not match the minimum prepaid card denomination.

  131. In dem Fall handelt es sich um Trustly und du musst einfach den Betrag eingeben. Hierfür kannst du unseren Vergleich nutzen und lizenzierte Anbieter finden. Wir haben dir eine Anleitung mit den einzelnen Schritten zusammengestellt, die du berücksichtigen musst, wenn du in der Online Spielothek oder im Casino mit https://forum.pkmd.pl/d/12727-casino-bonus-mit-trustly-angebote-und-regeln-im-check bezahlen möchtest. Nach deiner Anmeldung und der Verifizierung deiner Daten gelangst du in den Kassenbereich und kannst deine erste Einzahlung vornehmen. Wer in den Casinos mit PayPal spielen möchte, kann in Deutschland den Dienst in vollen Zügen genießen.

  143. Whether you want the best https://forum.rukoeu.com/d/174-online-pokies-with-payid-australia-real-money-complete-guide casino sites or understand why a specific transfer failed, you’ll find the answer here. Stick to 96%+ RTP pokies to stretch your bankroll, and read the bonus terms before you claim anything. On our list, SpinJo (under 3h), Neon54 (1–3h) and MyEmpire (same-day) are among the quickest. The bigger safety question is the casino itself, so stick to licensed sites with a good payout track record.

  144. Simply put, a high roller bonus is a casino promo designed for players who deposit and wager large amounts. Bottom line is this was not only the cheapest of the 10 listed bonuses but also the most beneficial. A few hundred of those are on the restricted list, but that still leaves thousands to choose from. I had to choose my games carefully, considering that over 300 games are restricted by the bonus terms, which cost me a bit of time as the 5-day window to complete 40x wagering started ticking. The deposit cap is ‘just’ A$2,500, but it remains one of the most practical bonuses listed, with almost all terms being fair and user-friendly, except perhaps the 5-day bonus duration.

    References: https://equal-page.free.nf/press/forum/topic/bpay-casinos-in-australia-2026-top-online-casinos-accepting-bpay-onlinecasinopulse/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *