|

HB7045: A Bill So Expansive It Needed to be Signed Twice.

ByAccountabaloney

Yesterday morning (5/11/21), Governor Ron DeSantis signed HB7045 into law at a private, Catholic school in Hialeah. And then, a few hours later he signed it, again, at another private, Catholic school in Jacksonville. You can watch the bill signing ceremonies here and here. The bill massively expands private school vouchers in Florida, dramatically raises the income qualifications to serve middle class children, and combines the special needs vouchers with the income based, directly funded Florida Empowerment Scholarship or FES (complicating its use for current special needs recipients and, also, placing those scholarships at risk in the event of a legal challenge to the FES). It is being heralded as the “largest expansion of school choice in the history of the state.”

The Wall Street Journal noted (and the Florida Department of Education celebrated) that the expansion is a “boon” to students already in private school and will make Florida “an education refuge for low- and middle-income families.” Edu-blogger Peter Greene had a different take:

DeSantis celebrated the “doubling down on our commitment to working families and making sure they have the ability to get their kids into the school of their choices” and called the bill “really, really far reaching.” He noted the bill as broadening opportunities, saying it would “eliminate bureaucratic barriers to education” and eliminate waitlists.

DeSantis explained he was most proud that HB7045 expands access to military families, so, in Florida, they will always have access to scholarship options (to potentially unaccredited schools) for their children, without regard to any wait list or maximum scholarship enrollment caps. So “if you’re wearing the uniform, we’re going to be there for you” (assuming you don’t mind lack of academic oversight or credentialed teachers, which these voucher do not require). The bill also gives priority to children in Foster Care (where one might wonder  who should be making such “choices” for children in Foster Care?).

In a nod to the parents of special needs recipients, who fought against the combining of their high risk children’s scholarship and the FES, DeSantis said “I didn’t necessarily ask for the change in Gardiner and McKay, so if we’re in a situation where we don’t think that the new students coming in are being serviced adequately we’ll be sure to make sure that we respond in the next legislative session.” Then he went on to celebrate:

“…at the end of the day, Florida has done more to provide families with choice in education, particularly our low income families, than any state in the country and we are proud of that … but I think the question before us for this legislative session is we’re not going to just stand pat and rest on our laurels, we’re going on offense, we’re going to expand choice, we’re not going to just be happy with the current amount of choices… We’re never satisfied. We’re always going to seek to do more. and today we’re expanding opportunities for tens of thousands of families throughout the great state of Florida.”

Florida’s Commissioner of Education Richard Corcoran, after his obligatory Frederick Douglas quote, claimed that the bill would, actually, make “anywhere from 1.2-1.7 million kids eligible to have that choice,” which he says will transform students’ (as well as their community’s and the entire state’s) “hearts, minds and souls.” For the record, currently, Florida’s 2,821 private schools serve just 397,970 or 12.2% of statewide total PK-12 student enrollment (the remaining 2,876,042 or 87.8% are public school students). An increase to 1.7 million is truly a massive increase.

Corcoran also said:

“If we want to save this Constitutional Republic for another 230 years , we have got to give a world class education to our students, we’ve got to give them that hope, we’ve got to give them that future… Governor, we can’t thank you enough for leading the way and making Florida the beacon of light, not just in Freedom but in Education for this country.”

Lieutenant Governor Jeanette Nunez said the bill would “truly” change the educational landscape in Florida, claiming that “parents have been so desperate for choice.” She believes “Florida is not only on the right side of the issue but we’re on the right side of history.”

State Senator, and staunch advocate of privatization, Manny Diaz Jr vowed Florida would continue to “move forward and never settle,” claiming “Florida leads the way.”

Frankly, it is nice that they are finally saying it out loud.

Public Education advocates have understood, for a while, that “School Choice” is simply a euphemism for “privatization” and that the end goal is the defunding of public school and vouchers for all. (For more information, read “A Wolf At The Schoolhouse Door,” which documents the history of privatization efforts, across the country, intent dismantling our system of free, universal, and taxpayer-funded public schooling. Not surprising, Florida features prominently in the book.) Public Education advocates have also recognized that the privatizers will “never settle” for anything less that the complete privatization of publicly funded education.

Following HB7045’s first signing in Hialeah, Governor DeSantis was asked about the impact of voucher expansion on the diversion of money away from public schools. In response, DeSantis denied he was defunding public schools, referring to the 2020 Teacher Salary Allocation (which was less an infusion of new funding and more a re-shuffling of existing funding) as “the biggest increase in public school teacher compensation that we’ve seen in this state in a generation.” DeSantis noted that, in the face of Covid, he could have vetoed the salary mandates, but he didn’t. He noted this year’s budget (which has relatively flat overall funding for public schools) maintained and slightly increased the salary allocation and “oh by the way, we delivered a $1,000 bonus for every public school in this state” (For the record, the much appreciated $1,000 teacher bonuses this year are funded entirely from President Biden’s American Rescue Plan.)

DeSantis said what he was doing was “blowing up all these tired old narratives”:

“We’re showing that we want parents to be able to obtain quality education for their kids and, you know what, the majority of parents in this state are going to avail themselves of the school in their local school district… I view it as all one big family, I don’t support scholarships at the exclusion of public education, just like I think it is wrong for people to say they will only support school districts and won’t support these choice programs. We’re supporting it all, because I think its important… we’re going to make sure all the education is as good as it can be, I don’t think it all comes in the same form, I don’t think it all is going to answer to the same bureaucracy but as long as that parent is happy with where that kid is going then I think our job will have been well done.”

Are they really “supporting it all?” As they say, budgets reflect priorities, and Florida’s 2021-22 Budget suggests the priority is NOT public schools:

  • Despite the Legislature touting a one billion dollar increase in education funding and a $38 increase in per-student funding, the reality is that most districts will see a REDUCTION in funding with an overall decrease of roughly $200 per student.
  • Florida Virtual School, which is expected to see a 6% DECREASE in enrollment, will see an overall 15% INCREASE in funding. 
  • Private School Voucher/Scholarship funding, increasingly funded through the public school funding formula, will INCREASE by 20%.

Also, when the Governor says “we’re going to make sure all the education is as good as it can be” he doesn’t mean in any sort of academically or fiscally accountable way. The FES vouchers, along will all the other massively expanded vouchers in HB7045, require little fiscal accountability and even less academic accountability. As noted in the 2017 series, “Schools Without Rules,” Florida’s billion dollar voucher industry is poorly regulated and has, essentially, zero academic oversight.

https://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/education/os-florida-school-voucher-investigation-1018-htmlstory.html

Is parental happiness a metric that can be used to hold these schools accountable? Public schools have long known that many students leave for voucher schools, only to return (often behind) a few years later. In 2017, the Urban Institute released a study evaluating the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship (FTCS), which is nearly identical to the FES except for its funding source. The authors discovered that 61% of FTCS recipients left the program within 2 years, 75% left within 3 years. It doesn’t sound like those parents are all that “happy.” According to the “Schools Without Rules” series, parents often use vouchers as a way to escape the onerous state mandated testing in public schools: “Escaping high-stakes testing is such a scholarship selling point that one private school administrator refers to students as “testing refugees.” If DeSantis believes “a job well done” can be measured by parental happiness, maybe he could focus on dismantling high stakes testing rather than dismantling public schools…

One thing is crystal clear, DeSantis, Corcoran and their legislative colleagues appear ready to continue marching until Florida becomes the first state without public education. Who is willing to try to stop them?

Similar Posts

90 Comments

  1. WBUR had a report on New Hampshire doing the same thing. And I’ve seen indications that Republicans in Iowa are pushing similar Education Spending Accounts.
    We need to understand that this is a national issue fed by a mix of anti-tax, anti-government, “the free market is God” true believers; cynical political hacks; and fast-buck charlatans.

  2. I am disappointed in the lack of comments about this from Florida-based Twitter accounts that are usually super critical of DeSantis.

    These accounts are on his tail daily, criticizing him for his COVID policies, voter suppression law, protest law, transgender sports, unemployment system, $1 billion consumer tax increase, possible links to the Matt Gaetz scandal, Trump-like outbursts at the media, etc. Yet the closest thing they’ve mentioned about the passing of this privatization bill and its signature is DeSantis blocking some media from the Hialeah press conference like he did with virtually all media with the election law. They don’t even mention what he was in Hialeah to do!

    I know that Florida Republicans who don’t tote the “choice” line get primary-ed, but are Florida Democrats too afraid of the machine to speak up, or are they just neutral or ambivalent on the issue?

    If they make the 2022 election all about COVID, Dems are in for a losing battle. They could really gain traction by throwing their full support behind strengthening the quality of traditional public schools.

  4. Many of us are quite satisfied with your disappointment. DeSantis listens to all voices (parents), and not just the powerful education monopoly. That’s a good thing and we want more of it. The self-interests of entrenched, inefficient, failing public school actors could not be more transparent. DeSantis: “We’re supporting it all, because I think its important… we’re going to make sure all the education is as good as it can be, I don’t think it all comes in the same form, I don’t think it all is going to answer to the same bureaucracy but as long as that parent is happy with where that kid is going then I think our job will have been well done.”

  5. Again, when the Governor says “we’re going to make sure all the education is as good as it can be” he doesn’t mean in any sort of academically or fiscally accountable way. These are tax payer dollars being spent with essentially no accountability. The goal is really privatization, not ensuring high quality publicly funded education in any meaningful way.

  6. The FTE belongs to the student, not the education monolith. Saying “again” in an authoritative tone doesn’t give your baseless comment more merit. Massive amounts of taxpayer dollars have been spent on public school black holes for decades with dismal results (RTI anyone?). The goal is really to improve students’ educational choices and outcomes in a meaningful way.

  7. The FTE is a calculated average. It rarely represents the actual amount spent on an individual student. Public education is crowd sourced. Communities, like mine, fund their schools through, primarily, local property taxes. The idea is that an educated populace benefits the entire community. Even childless individuals pay taxes for their local public schools. But, again, if the goal really was to improve outcomes in a meaningful way, then there would be some sort of oversight on the private vendors… taxpayers expect oversight. There is little to no academic or fiscal oversight to these privatization schemes.

  8. The mark of a narrative monopolizer restating known facts as though it is new information, to detract from relevant arguments. Much of the property tax from our residential area (higher median incomes) is reallocated to those public ed programs squandering mountains of taxpayer dollars with zip to show for it and no explanations. Ironically, that is nearly synonymous with no oversight. I suggest you repair your own house before you impugn another’s. Furthermore, there are many examples of taxpayer funds going to private/public projects which for the most part are not openly accountable to the public. Roads, bridges, rocket launches, etc.

  9. Are you in Florida? Because that is not how Florida school property taxes are distributed unless, perhaps, you are speaking about equitable spending within a school district. And the FLDOE requires an overwhelming mountain of compliance mandates… not to mention the oversight of locally elected school boards. Neither occurs when the “money follows the child” to private schools which don’t even require accreditation or certified teachers.

  10. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/data/publications/2002/house/reports/EdFactSheets/fact%20sheets/FloridaEducationFinanceProgram.pdf

    Regarding your statement “overwhelming mountain of compliance mandates”; there seems to be scarce documented compliance which can be proven to have actually been practiced. To boil it down, the teacher can make all the “notes” in a casefile he or she desires, but the student and family who maintain case notes of their experience will not be included in the “compliance” reporting. There seems to be substantial conflicting views as to what actually has been practiced in the classroom, whether it’s part of an RTI plan or 504. No merit is given to the student/family reports. Such a sweet cash rich system which is controlled by one side.

  11. So you believe giving families cash and asking them to find adequate services for their child’s special needs in a completely unregulated private marketplace is a better use of scarce public resources? Will this serve all of our at-risk students better, or just some? Public schools are governed by public oversight… not “controlled by one side.” As for RTI and 504 plans, we can do better but that will take attention and focus, not defunding and dismantling.
    It appears you have a specific axe to grind. Please go grind it elsewhere. We are trying to improve public education for all children here.

  12. It’s typical for public figures to use the tired “axe grinding” gotcha when faced with a solid argument. Ironic that they don’t apply the same standards to themselves. I am pro Choice, therefore, I oppose most rhetoric that is against Choice. When you frame your favorite counterpoint “giving families cash” as though they are stealing from the public coffers, that is a false narrative. As I mentioned, the FTE belongs to the individual student, not the public at large. So when that person makes the choice for the education services which best suit their needs, the money follows them to that end. It’s a very simple concept. Teacher’s unions and education monopolists have had far too much sway in keeping that truth from becoming law. Thankfully, our Governor is having none of it. Finally, to look a child in the eye and tell them to sacrifice their education, remain hostage to a failing system (as it perpetually corrects itself) to satisfy YOUR idealized vision is borderline criminal.

  14. Pingback: Gardiner Parents Frustrated, Demanding Oversight | accountabaloney

  35. Most of the wait happens at step 4, while the casino’s payments team reviews your request. Setting up PayID takes about five minutes inside the banking app you already use. We also recommend readers check real reviews of the appealing PayID casino online. This makes PayID one of the most cost-effective payment methods for online gambling in Australia.

    References: https://mrsurepunters.ng/forum/topic/payid-withdrawal-pokies-fast-cashouts-for-australian-pokies-players/

  37. Und nicht allen Nutzern ist wohl dabei, ihre Zugangsdaten auf der Seite eines Drittanbieters einzugeben, auch wenn Klarna ausdrücklich bezüglich des Datenschutzes zertifiziert ist. Allerdings steht es dem Casino-Betreiber frei, Boni für bevorzugte Zahlungsdienstleister oder auch vorgegebene Online Spielautomaten zu gewähren. Alternativ ist für die Online Casino-Auszahlung von Gewinnen die konventionelle Banküberweisung aufgrund ihrer Sicherheit und der meist gebührenfreien Ausführung empfehlenswert. Die Bestätigung erfolgt mit einer TAN, nach Ausführung ist das Geld sofort auf deinem Spielerkonto bei dem neuen Online https://discourse.metabase.com/t/spielautomaten-sofortuberweisung-sicher-einzahlen/341379 verfügbar. Nach Eingabe des Betrages erfolgt eine Weiterleitung zur Zahlungsseite von Sofort, auf der die Angaben zum eigenen Girokonto und dann der Login zum Online-Banking eingegeben werden.

  45. Its support for prepaid vouchers makes it a relevant choice among https://remi.tn/forum/d/25-new-neosurf-casinos-australia-unpacked online casinos in Australia, while the welcome offer provides up to AU$9,750 + 225 Free Spins for eligible new customers. The overall design focuses on quick navigation, while the casino’s security infrastructure supports a protected browsing experience. The system acts as a firewall between personal bank accounts and the best Neosurf casinos in Australia.

  49. Das bedeutet, Ihre Gewinne landen direkt auf Ihrem Girokonto, ohne dass Sie eine separate Auszahlungsmethode hinterlegen müssen. Auch Ihr Casino-Konto muss vollständig verifiziert sein, bevor Auszahlungen möglich sind. Eine Einzahlung mit Trustly ist einer der direktesten Wege, Geld ins Casino zu bringen. Da https://mark-down.de/paperless/d/75-online-casino-trustly-ohne-limit-was-wirklich-gilt direkt mit Ihrem Girokonto verbunden ist, sind Rückbuchungen unter Umständen komplizierter als bei Wallet-Zahlungen. Trustly Zahlungen sind in der Regel gebührenfrei, sowohl auf der Casino- als auch auf der Bankseite.

  71. Currently, https://forum.arivisti.com/forum/topic/rules-to-not-comply-with-about-australia-online-pokies-payid/ are only provided from operators holding foreign licences. As for PayID pokies, the situation is slightly more complicated, as slots are prohibited by the IGA. Users who bet on resources with a local licence can expect straightforward top-ups and instant online casino PayID withdrawal Australia. During this same period, the concept of ‘PayID casino Australia’ emerged – the method’s popularity did not go unnoticed by gambling operators.

  74. It’s a reasonable entry point into $20 Neosurf voucher casinos in Australia for anyone new to voucher play. As a real money casino with $20 https://academyem.com.br/forum/topic/neosurf-casino-customer-support-get-payment-help/ deposit acceptance, Rolling Slots rounds out the list well and suits shorter, casual sessions. Withdrawals rely on alternative methods, detailed at the cashier once verification clears. If you value a busy promotions calendar, this is a strong option among the best Neosurf casinos Australia keeps recommending, and it handles a $20 Neosurf casino deposit without fuss.

  86. Bank wires are slow but solid, and they usually carry the highest limits of any payment method. A bank wire sends money straight between your bank account and the casino, with no third party in the middle. Instant wire transfer casino to check with the bank and the casino’s terms and conditions to understand any potential costs involved. When you make a wire transfer deposit, the money is transferred directly from your bank account into the casino account. The main drawback when using crypto is the fact that you have to deal with wallets and exchanges.

    References: https://forum.pulsecms.com/t/fast-payout-casinos-australia-2026-real-withdrawal-tests/2415

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *