|

No One Was Blaming Parents

ByAccountabaloney

Today I had a column published in The Orlando Sentinel. It was a response to Nathan Hoffman’s August 30, 2026 “School choice isn’t to blame for teacher pay. Bureaucracy is,” which was a response to Andrew Spar’s “From vacancies to vouchers, Florida’s public schools face crisis.” Andrew Spar had raised serious concerns about public-school funding, fairness and accountability. Nathan Hoffman accused him of villainizing school-choice parents.

This is my published response:

Commentary: Look at the whole picture of school choice

Nathan Hoffman’s response (“School choice isn’t to blame for teacher pay. Bureaucracy is.”) to Andrew Spar’s Aug. 30 commentary is notable for what it leaves out.

Hoffman accuses Spar and the teachers’ union of ignoring reality in favor of “a more politically convenient argument” about school choice. Yet Hoffman largely ignores the solutions Spar actually proposed: increase public-school funding by at least $1,000 per student, eliminate laws that disadvantage public-school students and educators, and establish consistent standards across schools so parents can make informed choices.

Instead, Hoffman reframes the argument as an attack on parents, claiming that Spar’s narrative “paints parents choosing the best school for their kids as villains.”

But who is blaming parents?

Parents should choose the educational setting they believe is best for their children. Spar’s argument was about the policies Florida has created around those choices—not the parents making them.

That distinction is particularly relevant because Hoffman is Senior Legislative Director for the Foundation for Florida’s Future, an organization that advocates for expanding school choice. The report Hoffman cites to support his claim that “the money is there” was published by his own organization.

There is nothing wrong with advocating for school choice. But Hoffman criticizes Spar for choosing a politically convenient argument while responding to Spar’s substantive concerns with the all-too-familiar rhetoric of the movement he represents.

Hoffman celebrates choice because it allows parents to find the school that best meets their child’s needs, while sidestepping Spar’s call for the consistent information and standards parents need to evaluate those choices.

Hoffman also attempts to settle the funding question with his organization’s report showing that inflation-adjusted public-school spending per student increased 11.9% between 2019-20 and 2024-25. From that, he concludes, “The data show the money is there.”

The report demonstrates no such thing.

An increase from a chosen baseline does not establish that funding is adequate. Look back to 2007-08, Florida’s pre-Great Recession funding high-water mark, and the picture changes considerably. Adjusted for inflation using the same methodology employed in the Foundation’s report, current expenditures per student in 2024-25 were only about 6% higher than in 2007-08. Meanwhile, the average 2024-25 Florida teacher salary was about 15% lower in inflation-adjusted dollars—roughly $10,000 less in purchasing power.

There is certainly a legitimate question to ask about where education dollars go. School districts should answer it. Their budgets, expenditures, salaries, staffing and academic outcomes are public precisely so taxpayers can ask those questions.

But if “Where did the money go?” is the standard for public schools, it should also be the standard for the billions of public dollars Florida spends on vouchers. And if rigorous academic accountability helps parents choose schools, comparable information should be available for all publicly funded schools.

Hoffman is free to disagree with Spar’s proposals. But celebrating school choice does not answer them, and asking those questions does not make parents “villains.”

The real question isn’t whether parents should have choices. It is whether Florida will adequately fund its public schools and hold all publicly funded educational choices to meaningful, comparable standards.

That is not an attack on school choice. It is a call for accountability—and for parents to have the information they need to make those choices wisely.

Similar Posts

24 Comments

  3. Yes, neosurf casinos australia is one of the safest payment methods available for Australian online casino players.
    Only licensed, regulated casinos make our list, ensuring fair play and financial security.
    As we’ve mentioned throughout this guide, Neosurf functions as a deposit-only payment method at most Australian online casinos.
    Pokies are the bread and butter of Australian online casinos,
    and Neosurf casino sites deliver in spectacular fashion.
    Some Neosurf casino sites offer cashback on losses over a specific period,
    usually weekly or monthly. The most common promotion you’ll encounter is
    the welcome bonus, where the casino matches your first deposit by a
    certain percentage.

  4. Jedoch sollte im Trustly Casino ohne Anmeldung auch beachtet werden, dass es neben den Vorteilen auch
    Nachteile gibt. Wenn man einen Bonus beansprucht hat, dann muss man in den Casinos mit Trustly zunächst die
    Umsatzbedingungen erfüllen, bevor das Geld wieder ausgezahlt werden kann.
    Wer in einem Online Casino mit Trustly einzahlt, kann auch später seine Gewinne wieder auf sein Trustly Konto auszahlen. Das Smartphone sollte ebenfalls gut geschützt sein und in jedem
    Fall mit einer PIN verriegelt. Zu den wichtigen Voraussetzungen gehört, dass auf
    dem eigenen Computer ein gutes, aktuelles Antivirus-Programm läuft, am besten auch
    ein Schutz vor Malware. Darüber hinaus können Spieler
    ebenfalls einiges dazu beitragen, dass Zahlungen im Casino
    mit Trustly und auch Wett-Zahlungen mit Trustly sicher ausgeführt werden.

    References: forum.koneksea.com

  5. Ein Automaten-Anbieter oder ein Online casino einzahlung sofortüberweisung mit
    Klarna Sofort bietet eine Zahlungsoption, bei der Einzahlungen unmittelbar und ohne Verzögerung auf das Spielerkonto
    übertragen werden. Zusammenfassend lässt sich feststellen,
    dass Klarna als Zahlungsmethode für Online Casinos und Spielotheken durchaus empfehlenswert ist.
    Es ist jedoch wichtig zu betonen, dass diese Möglichkeit nicht bei allen Anbietern besteht und vor allem Casinos mit 10 Euro
    Einzahlungslimit verbreitet sind.

  7. If your priority is volatility-heavy slots from Hacksaw Gaming or Nolimit City,
    Bitstarz and 7Bit carry deeper catalogues than the AU-focused brands.
    Cryptocurrency payouts at brands like Bitstarz, 7Bit
    and RocketPlay often clear within 10 to 60 minutes.
    Buying and using Neosurf vouchers is legal. Ricky Casino and Hellspin round out
    the list for players who want newer platforms with faster withdrawal rails.

    That combination makes it the default for brands built around payment methods online casinos that accept neosurf bypass
    card networks.

  8. Das Geld steht euch in Echtzeit auf dem Spielerkonto im https://www.freelancer-gilde.de/d/5-trustly-casino-sicherheit-so-schutzen-sie-geld-und-daten Casino zur Verfügung und wird auch sofort von eurem Bankkonto abgebucht. Wie üblich wählt ihr als erstes die gewünschte Zahlungsmethode aus, in diesem Fall also Trustly. Eine detaillierte Auflistung aller Banken, mit denen Trustly zusammenarbeitet, findet ihr auf der Website von Trustly. Denn auch wenn die Zahlungsmethode angeboten wird, kann es sein, dass ihr keinen Zugriff darauf habt. Das hat mehrere Gründe, die wir uns für euch in diesem Artikel genauer anschauen werden.

  9. You want to see where money goes, how fast it moves,
    and what fees may apply if any. Neosurf casino
    australia appeals because players can review payment
    rules before committing funds smart, plain, and
    easier to trust. Neosurf keeps card details out of the transaction flow,
    that cuts exposure and gives cautious players a cleaner, tighter $10 deposit bonus casino neosurf australia method.
    If I were weighing risk with my own cash, I’d rate Neosurf online casino australia highly
    for payment control. If terms shift overnight…, that is part of
    the risk profile too.

  10. Best Neosurf Pokies Australia 2026 operates under an offshore licence, typically Curacao in this market segment, rather than any Australian authorisation. Players should only take a new address
    from the operator’s own verified communication, such as an email sent
    to the registered account or a message in live chat, rather
    than from unsolicited links or third-party listings.
    A deposit wagering rule, commonly around x3 turnover on the deposit amount, can apply
    before a withdrawal is approved, separate from any
    active bonus wagering.

    References: bkonline.id

  11. Currently, PayID online pokies are only provided from operators holding foreign licences.

    As for limits, it’s best to check the casino’s terms to
    know the specific boundaries. Make an instant PayID deposit and claim a bonus at a recommended PayID online casino today.
    Cryptocurrencies offered in Bitcoin casinos, Litecoin casinos, and Ripple casinos have gained popularity as alternative payment methods in online casinos.

    References: community.graffain.com

  24. It’s quickly becoming a favourite among Aussie
    gamblers for its simplicity and anonymity, offering an easy way to
    fund your gaming adventures. Neosurf vouchers are non-reloadable, so funds cannot be pushed back
    onto them. The list below covers operators that accept Neosurf vouchers, most of them
    offshore and licensed outside Australia.
    Neosurf deposits at those sites spiked because players lost access to local banking rails.
    You buy a physical or digital voucher for a fixed amount,
    receive a 16-digit PIN, and enter that code at the cashier.

    References: forum.everestinnovation.it

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *